The Russians Are Coming!

by Rob Dover on 29 June 2010 · 13 comments

Or perhaps not…

A foreign intelligence agency caught in trying to gain information shocker… Yes, we were greeted with the amazingly surprising news that a foreign power (not known for keeping its intelligence gathering modest) had been running sleepers in the US. These alleged spies (because whilst they’ve been charged, they’ve not been convicted… I know, I know.. terribly old fashioned..) had been supposedly been monitored by the FBI for ten years. They had posed as married couples and ‘ordinary’ and ‘unobtrusive’ people during that time, but they had been conspicuous in as much as they had been practising what Le Carré would have described as ‘Moscow Rules’ during that time.

What is perhaps most surprising is the sort of information that these people have been allegedly tasked to discover. According to court documents, and as reported by the BBC, these included: ‘information on nuclear weapons, US arms control positions, Iran, White House rumours, CIA leadership turnover, and political parties’. Nothing as dazzling as Russian operations of old which uncovered the plans for nuclear weapons and turning over intelligence officers in very high positions (e.g. the Cambridge Five, and Aldrich Ames in the US). Indeed, the information they were tasked with finding could be described as mundane, and very easily replicated through open sources. Five or so magazine and newspaper subscriptions would have probably done the job equally as well.

Commentators on the radio this morning put this secret operation down to the ‘Russian obsession with secret material’.. but I’m not sure western politicians are immune. Stick a nice big red label on something that says ‘secret’ or ‘top secret’ and I can guarantee you a politician will actually see ‘important’, or ‘very important’ (I wonder if anyone has ever done systematic research on that?). This ‘obsession’ might actually translate to an issue of trust – can I trust the source of my information? Much easier to sell if you trust the individual supplying it, I suppose.

But the more interesting element of this case, as it develops, is not that the Russians were playing spy games in America. I’d drop down unwell if the Americans weren’t doing the same to them, and we still have the shining and glorious moment in British intelligence history of the plastic listening rock placed in Moscow by our own gallant lads… No, the more interesting element (relevant to Europeans as well) is that these characters were also empowered to seek out investment opportunities for Russian money in think-tanks and lobbying outfits. The new capitalist Russia doesn’t need to turn westerners to work for them, it gives them a whacking great big research grant instead. Buying influence is again nothing new – western industry has done it successfully for years and years – but this is the great leap that has been made by Russians, particularly in Europe actually.

So, whilst this is embarrassing it is also temporary. This particular ‘shocker’ will fade into the annals of news cuttings. The growing influence of Russian money (amongst others, let’s not single out Russia here, there are some very much less desirable funding sources in UK think-tanks and higher education than them) is perhaps the bigger cause for concern. Perhaps the Cold War has given way to a behind-the-scenes battle for ideas. ‘Follow the money’ is the famous cry from Watergate, as it was from the popular TV depiction ‘The Wire’. In both cases, uncovering the money reveals some seriously discomforting revelations.

Don’t worry so much about espionage; start worrying about influence.

{ 13 comments… read them below or add one }

Edward 29 June 2010 at 12:21

So, the Russians are now in a position to buy influence, rendering traditional spying less relevant. Well, yes, quite possibly.

Reply

James 29 June 2010 at 12:32

I don’t really understand why the Russians would not use this new capital to train and deploy more spies as well as attempting to buy influence. The strategies are hardly mutually exclusive. And anyway, surely this discovery – if found to be substantial – is evidence that spying in still relevant and something to worry about.

Reply

Rob Dover 29 June 2010 at 12:50

You’re right. It’s not mutually exclusive. And the emphasis on Russian security probably does mean enlarged services.

However, from what the court documents say this is fairly tame stuff. More worrying forms come from intrusions (often electronic) into infrastructure systems.

Reply

The Faceless Bureaucrat 29 June 2010 at 13:44

The sneaky bastards: cleverly disguised as hoseheads!

http://www.canada.com:80/news/national/Somnia/3212596/story.html

Reply

Rob Dover 29 June 2010 at 13:51

The ignominy…. :-)

Reply

Ed 29 June 2010 at 19:28

Stick a nice big red label on something that says ’secret’ or ‘top secret’ and I can guarantee you a politician will actually see ‘important’, or ‘very important’ (I wonder if anyone has ever done systematic research on that?).

Check out the chapter on “scarcity” in Robert Cialdini’s magnificent Influence: the Psychology of Persuasion. Basically, yes.

Reply

Rob Dover 29 June 2010 at 20:18

Many thanks!

Reply

MrKelvin 30 June 2010 at 06:19

Oh dear, We in the US have an unfair advantage, and we aim to clean up. You need to understand we love you, but we need to move forward as one in science. You are going to have to earn our trust, or fear our kindness.

Mind control is a is a voice in your head…..but which one?

K

Reply

Quintin 1 July 2010 at 06:05

The growing influence of Russian money (amongst others, let’s not single out Russia here, there are some very much less desirable funding sources in UK think-tanks and higher education than them) is perhaps the bigger cause for concern.

This is potentially a double-edged sword. When in the near future, a scientist develops a train of thought that departs from the mainstream, would he also be expected to prove his endeavours as nonpartisan by arguing all of his benefactors and grantors as non-influential – in a manner of guilty until proven innocent? And since it is reasonable to expects some manner of influence from a grantor, where would we draw the line on that?

Reply

Rob Dover 1 July 2010 at 09:30

I understand your point, but I disagree. This is not about accounting for ones benefactors – a’la big pharma etc – in science. This is about research institutes pumping out social scientific /political propaganda; and doing so on behalf of interests which are directly opposed to what one might loosely describe as a ‘western way of life/politics’. Now, there is obviously a ‘critical’ point to be made about the rest of us who are government funded, and that point is taken. But the weak underbelly of liberalism is its willingness to allow its enemies to come and preach unfettered to it. Oh, and these institutes never announce themselves.. the funding tends to be obscure.

Reply

D. Taylor Sgt.USA -Ret 3 July 2010 at 13:58

Question:
What are we not supposed to be paying attention to, while this media circus is being played out before the (gullible?) American public?
Very often the sound not heard (or being drowned out) is more important then the noise that permeates the masses.

Reply

Formerly Grant 3 July 2010 at 21:10

To quote a librarian I’m related to ‘they could have just asked me for the information, that’s my job’. To me, the only troubling part of this is the involvement of think tanks that I could have been relying on for analysis of something. Considering the information involved, I’m not sure why Russia bothered to spend so much. Of course we can’t disregard the possibility that the FBI was aware of some other leak that they simply couldn’t prove or admit to. Wonder who we’ll trade them for.

Reply

Richard McEnroe 4 July 2010 at 21:07

“The Russians Are Coming!”

Nah, she was probably faking it…

Reply

Be sensible, be polite.

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Previous post:

Next post: