<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stanley, homework!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kingsofwar.org.uk/2010/06/stanley-homework/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kingsofwar.org.uk/2010/06/stanley-homework/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 06:59:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Faceless Bureaucrat</title>
		<link>http://kingsofwar.org.uk/2010/06/stanley-homework/comment-page-1/#comment-6752</link>
		<dc:creator>The Faceless Bureaucrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 03:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kingsofwar.org.uk/?p=4307#comment-6752</guid>
		<description>Are you SURE?  Oh, the humanity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you SURE?  Oh, the humanity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Betz</title>
		<link>http://kingsofwar.org.uk/2010/06/stanley-homework/comment-page-1/#comment-6751</link>
		<dc:creator>David Betz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 21:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kingsofwar.org.uk/?p=4307#comment-6751</guid>
		<description>The top half of this discussion is pretty deep, i.e., Platonic republicanism et al, but the bottom half is pretty shallow--perfect for my contribution:   

Denise Richards is two words. More to the point she did not appear in the shower scene in question. Alas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The top half of this discussion is pretty deep, i.e., Platonic republicanism et al, but the bottom half is pretty shallow&#8211;perfect for my contribution:   </p>
<p>Denise Richards is two words. More to the point she did not appear in the shower scene in question. Alas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cincinattus Jr.</title>
		<link>http://kingsofwar.org.uk/2010/06/stanley-homework/comment-page-1/#comment-6743</link>
		<dc:creator>Cincinattus Jr.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 00:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kingsofwar.org.uk/?p=4307#comment-6743</guid>
		<description>I must say this excursion from the subject has restored myu faith in those who inhabit these ivied fora.  ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must say this excursion from the subject has restored myu faith in those who inhabit these ivied fora.  ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Faceless Bureaucrat</title>
		<link>http://kingsofwar.org.uk/2010/06/stanley-homework/comment-page-1/#comment-6742</link>
		<dc:creator>The Faceless Bureaucrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 00:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kingsofwar.org.uk/?p=4307#comment-6742</guid>
		<description>One word: Denise Richards.  &#039;Nuf said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One word: Denise Richards.  &#8216;Nuf said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Berserker</title>
		<link>http://kingsofwar.org.uk/2010/06/stanley-homework/comment-page-1/#comment-6741</link>
		<dc:creator>Berserker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 18:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kingsofwar.org.uk/?p=4307#comment-6741</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s compelling me to borrow from Bairnsfather: 

If you know a better shower scene, I&#039;ll go to it.

Thanks to one and all for intriguing me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s compelling me to borrow from Bairnsfather: </p>
<p>If you know a better shower scene, I&#8217;ll go to it.</p>
<p>Thanks to one and all for intriguing me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gunrunner</title>
		<link>http://kingsofwar.org.uk/2010/06/stanley-homework/comment-page-1/#comment-6740</link>
		<dc:creator>Gunrunner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 17:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kingsofwar.org.uk/?p=4307#comment-6740</guid>
		<description>Whoa. . . .    :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoa. . . .    :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Faceless Bureaucrat</title>
		<link>http://kingsofwar.org.uk/2010/06/stanley-homework/comment-page-1/#comment-6739</link>
		<dc:creator>The Faceless Bureaucrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 16:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kingsofwar.org.uk/?p=4307#comment-6739</guid>
		<description>Yes, G/R, but Heinlein&#039;s book had no shower scenes.  So, you win some, you lose some.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, G/R, but Heinlein&#8217;s book had no shower scenes.  So, you win some, you lose some.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Berserker</title>
		<link>http://kingsofwar.org.uk/2010/06/stanley-homework/comment-page-1/#comment-6738</link>
		<dc:creator>Berserker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 16:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kingsofwar.org.uk/?p=4307#comment-6738</guid>
		<description>...And since orc warriors are the &quot;warrior class&quot; among orcs, shouldn&#039;t that be &quot;warrior credo&quot; or something like that instead of &quot;warrior class&quot;, if you&#039;re talking about something virtuous? After all, who likes orcs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;And since orc warriors are the &#8220;warrior class&#8221; among orcs, shouldn&#8217;t that be &#8220;warrior credo&#8221; or something like that instead of &#8220;warrior class&#8221;, if you&#8217;re talking about something virtuous? After all, who likes orcs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cincinattus Jr.</title>
		<link>http://kingsofwar.org.uk/2010/06/stanley-homework/comment-page-1/#comment-6737</link>
		<dc:creator>Cincinattus Jr.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 14:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kingsofwar.org.uk/?p=4307#comment-6737</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the clarification--I admit to not having read ST , although i note it was added to my service&#039;s reading list some time ago.   Given the stack of yet to be read material scattered around me, I have not had the time  for SciFi titles, even if popular in some circles for other reasons than fantasy.

Seeing that your reference was deeper than my initial take (as I assumed it had to be given your other excellent, though at times IMHO wrong-headed, posts ;-) ) I think we again are in agreement within the narrow point you were making.  More broadly, however I do think some form of national service is on balance a good thing for a constitutional republic like ours.  I add a caveat though--only if it is evenly applied without favoritism like that enjoyed in the Vietnam era that afforded many (the evil Cheney and the misunderstood Teddy Bear Clinton come to mind as examples). 

I also agree that the military should not be officially considered a special class or caste, although I firmly believe the military should be ( by the govt as such) a special profession in the sense of it&#039;s standards of conduct, entrance requirements etc.  Regardless, military service should not be the sole criterion for citizenship- a corollary however would be that merely being born in the US should not equate to citizenship either, but that is a topic for another day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the clarification&#8211;I admit to not having read ST , although i note it was added to my service&#8217;s reading list some time ago.   Given the stack of yet to be read material scattered around me, I have not had the time  for SciFi titles, even if popular in some circles for other reasons than fantasy.</p>
<p>Seeing that your reference was deeper than my initial take (as I assumed it had to be given your other excellent, though at times IMHO wrong-headed, posts ;-) ) I think we again are in agreement within the narrow point you were making.  More broadly, however I do think some form of national service is on balance a good thing for a constitutional republic like ours.  I add a caveat though&#8211;only if it is evenly applied without favoritism like that enjoyed in the Vietnam era that afforded many (the evil Cheney and the misunderstood Teddy Bear Clinton come to mind as examples). </p>
<p>I also agree that the military should not be officially considered a special class or caste, although I firmly believe the military should be ( by the govt as such) a special profession in the sense of it&#8217;s standards of conduct, entrance requirements etc.  Regardless, military service should not be the sole criterion for citizenship- a corollary however would be that merely being born in the US should not equate to citizenship either, but that is a topic for another day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gunrunner</title>
		<link>http://kingsofwar.org.uk/2010/06/stanley-homework/comment-page-1/#comment-6731</link>
		<dc:creator>Gunrunner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 12:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kingsofwar.org.uk/?p=4307#comment-6731</guid>
		<description>Heinlein&#039;s Starship Troopers is a classic and one of my favorites. 

Shame what they did to it when they made that awful movie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heinlein&#8217;s Starship Troopers is a classic and one of my favorites. </p>
<p>Shame what they did to it when they made that awful movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

