<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The 2010 QDR and COIN: some initial thoughts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kingsofwar.org.uk/2010/01/the-2010-qdr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kingsofwar.org.uk/2010/01/the-2010-qdr/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 14:07:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The 2010 QDR is Here &#171; Automatic Ballpoint</title>
		<link>http://kingsofwar.org.uk/2010/01/the-2010-qdr/comment-page-1/#comment-4301</link>
		<dc:creator>The 2010 QDR is Here &#171; Automatic Ballpoint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 15:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kingsofwar.org.uk/?p=3245#comment-4301</guid>
		<description>[...] roundup: Curzon at ComingAnarchy, Kings of War&#8217;s David Ucko, David Axe, and Foreign Policy offers a &#8220;How to Read the QDR&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] roundup: Curzon at ComingAnarchy, Kings of War&#8217;s David Ucko, David Axe, and Foreign Policy offers a &#8220;How to Read the QDR&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gunrunner</title>
		<link>http://kingsofwar.org.uk/2010/01/the-2010-qdr/comment-page-1/#comment-4255</link>
		<dc:creator>Gunrunner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 13:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kingsofwar.org.uk/?p=3245#comment-4255</guid>
		<description>As an update, from today&#039;s Air Force Magazine On-Line:

Meet Your Air Force, in Rough Form: The 2010 Quadrennial Defense Review is set for release Monday. But a draft iteration circulating inside the Washington, D.C., beltway last week shed some light on what to expect, such as Air Force plans to field a force structure of 71 to72 combat wings between 2011 and 2015. This includes: 29 airlift and aerial refueling wing-equivalents (with 33 primary mission aircraft per unit); 11 to 12 theater strike wing-equivalents (with 72 PMA per unit); 10 space and cyberspace wings; eight intelligence-surveillance-reconnaissance wings (with approximately 300 total aircraft); five long-range strike (bomb) wings (with up to 96 PMA); five air superiority wing-equivalents (with 72 PMA per unit); and three command and control wings (with a total of 30 aircraft and five air and space operations centers). By comparison, the 2006 QDR organized the Air Force around 86 combat wings. Stay tuned for more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an update, from today&#8217;s Air Force Magazine On-Line:</p>
<p>Meet Your Air Force, in Rough Form: The 2010 Quadrennial Defense Review is set for release Monday. But a draft iteration circulating inside the Washington, D.C., beltway last week shed some light on what to expect, such as Air Force plans to field a force structure of 71 to72 combat wings between 2011 and 2015. This includes: 29 airlift and aerial refueling wing-equivalents (with 33 primary mission aircraft per unit); 11 to 12 theater strike wing-equivalents (with 72 PMA per unit); 10 space and cyberspace wings; eight intelligence-surveillance-reconnaissance wings (with approximately 300 total aircraft); five long-range strike (bomb) wings (with up to 96 PMA); five air superiority wing-equivalents (with 72 PMA per unit); and three command and control wings (with a total of 30 aircraft and five air and space operations centers). By comparison, the 2006 QDR organized the Air Force around 86 combat wings. Stay tuned for more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

